H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 1-0
Alexander Volkov holds a 1–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexander Volkov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexander Volkov won the 1992 Auckland fourth round 6-2 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1992* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alexander Volkov | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |