H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Mikael Tillstrom H2H: 1-2
Mikael Tillstrom holds a 2–1 lead over Alexander Volkov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mikael Tillstrom leads 2–0 on carpet, while Alexander Volkov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexander Volkov won the 1996 US Open second round 1-6 6-4 6-1 4-6 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Alexander Volkov | 1-6 6-4 6-1 4-6 7-6(8) | Mikael Tillstrom | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1996* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mikael Tillstrom | 6-2 7-5 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1996* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mikael Tillstrom | 7-5 7-6(2) | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,831 | 107 | 108 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #80 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |