H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-1
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Alexander Volkov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1997 Tashkent fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 1997* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-3 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |