H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Alexander Bublik H2H: 1-3
Alexander Bublik holds a 3–1 lead over Alexander Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alexander Bublik leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Alexander Zverev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Bublik won the 2023 Halle semifinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Kazakhstan
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2023* | Halle | ATP 500 | SF | Grass | Alexander Bublik | 6-3 7-5 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2023* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Alexander Bublik | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2022* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Alexander Bublik | 6-4 6-3 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2021* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Alexander Bublik | 7-5 6-3 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Alexander Bublik | #11 | #10 | 3,445 | 2,065 | 200 | 174 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Alexander Bublik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #162 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2019 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2020 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #50 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2021 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #36 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2022 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | 2023 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #32 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #33 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | 2025 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #11 | 2,002 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | 2026 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #11 | 1,881 | 0 | 9 |