H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-0
Alexander Zverev holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexander Zverev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Zverev won the 2019 Marrakech third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2019* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 6-4 6-4 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2015 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Alexander Zverev | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |