H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 3-0
Alexander Zverev holds a 3–0 lead over Federico Delbonis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alexander Zverev leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Zverev won the 2022 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2022* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 6-1 7-5 | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2019* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 6-4 7-6(2) | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
| May 24, 2019* | Geneva | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 7-5 6-7(6) 6-3 | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Federico Delbonis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |