H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:17 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Jesper de Jong H2H: 3-0
Alexander Zverev holds a 3–0 lead over Jesper de Jong in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alexander Zverev leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Zverev won the 2026 Roland Garros fourth round 7-6(3) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 26
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 7-6(3) 6-4 6-1 | Jesper de Jong | Match data |
| May 29, 2025* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 3-6 6-1 6-2 6-3 | Jesper de Jong | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2024* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 6-2 6-2 | Jesper de Jong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Jesper de Jong | #73 | #71 | 821 | 1,766 | 24 | 32 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Jesper de Jong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2024 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #112 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2025 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | 2026 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |