H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 4-0
Alexander Zverev holds a 4–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alexander Zverev leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexander Zverev won the 2018 Shanghai Masters quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Alexander Zverev | 6-4 6-4 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| May 18, 2018* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 7-5 7-6(11) | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2017* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Alexander Zverev | 6-3 7-6(3) | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| May 19, 2016* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 5-7 7-5 0-0 (ret.) | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |