H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Marcel Granollers H2H: 1-1
Alexander Zverev and Marcel Granollers are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Zverev won the 2016 Nice fourth round 7-5 6-7(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2016* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Marcel Granollers | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Marcel Granollers | #1,009 | #19 | 1,635 | 1,934 | 202 | 245 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Marcel Granollers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #56 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2010 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2011 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #38 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | 2014 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #46 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | 2015 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #37 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #177 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 4 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |