H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Novak Djokovic H2H: 4-8
Novak Djokovic holds a 8–4 lead over Alexander Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 6–3 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2025 Roland Garros quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
8
12 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2025* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Jan 25, 2025* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Alexander Zverev | 7-6 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2023* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Nov 22, 2021* | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | SF | Hard | Alexander Zverev | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Sep 11, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-2 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 7-6(6) | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Nov 16, 2020 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-6(4) | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 6-2 6-2 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Nov 20, 2018* | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | F | Hard | Alexander Zverev | 6-4 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2018 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-1 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-1 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| May 21, 2017* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 6-4 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Novak Djokovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 |