H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Alexander Zverev holds a 2–1 lead over Peter Gojowczyk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alexander Zverev leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2022 Mexican Open second round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Gojowczyk | (w/o) | Alexander Zverev | Match data | Feb 24, 2022* | R16 | Mexican Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Alexander Zverev | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data | Mar 1, 2018* | R16 | Mexican Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Alexander Zverev | 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data | Jan 18, 2018* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,260 | 540 | 218 | 71.2% | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25 |
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,884 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,011 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,055 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,130 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 58–13 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 0 | 19 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,183 | 0 | 19 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,096 | 0 | 21 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,132 | 0 | 23 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 54–23 | 70.1% | #3 | 2,042 | 0 | 24 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #2 | 2,125 | 1 | 25 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 29 | 14 | 43 | 67.4% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 33 | 13 | 46 | 71.7% | 20 | 3 | 23 | 87.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 40 | 7 | 47 | 85.1% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2014 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 2022 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2023 | 29 | 15 | 44 | 65.9% | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2016 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 35 | 11 | 46 | 76.1% | 23 | 6 | 29 | 79.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2017 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 28 | 2025 | 30 | 13 | 43 | 69.8% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2018 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2026 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 2019 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Career | — | 300 | 128 | 428 | 70.1% | 186 | 65 | 251 | 74.1% | 54 | 25 | 79 | 68.4% | — | 56 | 66 | 122 | 45.9% | 7 | 17 | 24 | 29.2% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 741/761 of Alexander Zverev's and 171/172 of Peter Gojowczyk's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 35.9% | 50.0% | 24.0% | 25.0% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 10/10 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 53.6% | 58.1% | 49.6% | 50.1% | 32.4% | 54.3% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 31/31 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 60.6% | 71.8% | 48.2% | 59.3% | 47.3% | 62.4% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 66/66 | 6.3 | 4.5 | 61.4% | 72.5% | 51.2% | 63.7% | 45.9% | 64.3% | 38.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 75/75 | 8.1 | 3.5 | 64.4% | 75.3% | 54.1% | 62.6% | 50.9% | 67.9% | 37.7% | 2010 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 64.3% | 47.6% | 51.4% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 49.0% | 38.7% |
| 21 | 2018 | 73/73 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 64.3% | 75.7% | 54.2% | 54.8% | 47.0% | 67.8% | 40.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 65/65 | 10.7 | 5.9 | 66.8% | 75.6% | 45.7% | 58.9% | 42.5% | 65.5% | 39.0% | 2012 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 58.5% | 56.9% | 43.1% | 47.1% | 44.4% | 51.2% | 38.5% |
| 23 | 2020 | 36/36 | 11.3 | 5.3 | 68.6% | 78.3% | 47.9% | 61.1% | 45.3% | 68.8% | 40.5% | 2013 | 2/2 | 11.5 | 7.0 | 53.5% | 76.7% | 50.7% | 63.1% | 47.3% | 64.8% | 39.4% |
| 24 | 2021 | 64/71 | 10.4 | 3.8 | 68.0% | 77.8% | 52.9% | 56.1% | 43.9% | 69.8% | 40.6% | 2014 | 15/15 | 7.4 | 3.5 | 57.4% | 74.7% | 50.2% | 69.6% | 49.6% | 64.1% | 35.1% |
| 25 | 2022 | 34/35 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 71.6% | 73.7% | 48.5% | 56.4% | 51.2% | 66.5% | 39.7% | 2015 | 4/4 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 54.2% | 72.3% | 48.8% | 60.7% | 35.4% | 61.5% | 41.3% |
| 26 | 2023 | 78/78 | 8.1 | 2.8 | 70.8% | 74.5% | 50.6% | 62.7% | 37.4% | 67.3% | 37.9% | 2016 | 3/3 | 13.3 | 1.7 | 61.2% | 75.8% | 48.3% | 70.8% | 37.5% | 65.1% | 26.5% |
| 27 | 2024 | 79/83 | 9.6 | 2.3 | 70.8% | 78.3% | 57.0% | 68.1% | 43.1% | 71.9% | 38.5% | 2017 | 23/23 | 7.6 | 4.1 | 54.1% | 78.0% | 48.0% | 53.8% | 54.0% | 64.1% | 37.2% |
| 28 | 2025 | 73/77 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 71.8% | 74.3% | 53.2% | 52.9% | 41.9% | 68.7% | 38.5% | 2018 | 48/48 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 54.2% | 75.4% | 49.2% | 55.9% | 36.1% | 63.2% | 35.3% |
| 29 | 2026 | 56/60 | 9.6 | 2.2 | 72.1% | 76.6% | 57.2% | 51.0% | 40.3% | 71.3% | 37.1% | 2019 | 31/31 | 6.2 | 4.0 | 54.0% | 70.0% | 45.3% | 54.6% | 40.8% | 58.7% | 33.9% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4/4 | 9.3 | 4.5 | 57.1% | 72.9% | 50.7% | 50.0% | 26.7% | 63.2% | 33.9% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 22/22 | 7.6 | 5.1 | 51.7% | 78.0% | 48.0% | 65.7% | 38.3% | 63.5% | 35.5% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17/18 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 52.9% | 65.5% | 44.5% | 51.3% | 38.3% | 55.6% | 32.1% |
| Career | — | 741/761 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 67.5% | 75.2% | 52.2% | 59.1% | 44.1% | 67.7% | 38.6% | — | 171/172 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 54.2% | 73.7% | 47.8% | 57.5% | 41.1% | 61.7% | 35.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 2011 | 1486 | 92.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 1497 | 101.5 | +0.17 | -1.12 | 0.589 | 36.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 1574 | 121.3 | -3.93 | -0.69 | 0.816 | 45.7% | — | +27 | — | 40.9% | -1.05 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.23 | 2007 | 1484 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 1768 | 138.7 | -1.35 | -1.51 | 0.885 | 48.3% | -73 | -98 | -78 | 44.7% | -0.32 | 10–7 (59%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | -0.65 | 2008 | 1463 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 2011 | 165.0 | +0.87 | +2.35 | 1.080 | 51.5% | -35 | -158 | -148 | 59.6% | +0.51 | 17–10 (63%) | 19–12 (61%) | — | -1.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2055 | 170.5 | +4.24 | +3.03 | 1.173 | 52.7% | -35 | -1 | -103 | 66.0% | +0.83 | 18–10 (64%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | -0.40 | 2010 | 1516 | 104.5 | +0.44 | +1.12 | 0.759 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.20 |
| 21 | 2018 | 2126 | 170.2 | +3.79 | +4.87 | 1.253 | 53.4% | -14 | +77 | -205 | 70.0% | +1.05 | 12–10 (55%) | 15–6 (71%) | — | +2.37 | 2011 | 1506 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 2031 | 164.5 | +1.72 | +3.34 | 1.133 | 51.9% | +27 | +88 | -162 | 59.0% | +0.50 | 12–10 (55%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | +2.74 | 2012 | 1585 | 118.6 | -1.08 | -5.85 | 0.788 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 |
| 23 | 2020 | 2130 | 170.0 | +5.36 | +3.59 | 1.298 | 53.8% | +21 | -50 | — | 69.7% | +1.16 | 7–3 (70%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | -0.61 | 2013 | 1610 | 112.7 | -1.87 | +0.62 | 1.118 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 55.6% | +0.11 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.36 |
| 24 | 2021 | 2255 | 175.2 | +6.59 | +4.64 | 1.343 | 54.3% | +32 | -37 | -344 | 75.8% | +1.53 | 11–8 (58%) | 20–10 (67%) | — | -1.85 | 2014 | 1697 | 138.1 | +0.13 | +0.88 | 0.980 | 50.0% | +27 | -187 | -115 | 47.4% | -0.16 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.47 |
| 25 | 2022 | 2184 | 161.5 | +2.95 | +3.25 | 1.185 | 52.8% | +15 | +81 | — | 70.2% | +1.06 | 6–3 (67%) | 11–2 (85%) | — | +0.04 | 2015 | 1653 | 118.0 | +0.17 | +0.96 | 1.073 | 51.7% | +47 | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | — | — | — | +0.08 |
| 26 | 2023 | 2096 | 163.2 | +3.63 | +2.62 | 1.161 | 52.2% | +12 | +96 | -130 | 61.7% | +0.76 | 18–5 (78%) | 18–20 (47%) | — | -1.77 | 2016 | 1678 | 121.7 | +1.67 | -1.23 | 0.759 | 46.8% | +42 | — | — | 25.0% | -0.88 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.59 |
| 27 | 2024 | 2132 | 169.5 | +7.35 | +3.38 | 1.373 | 54.4% | +6 | +88 | -104 | 71.6% | +1.32 | 12–11 (52%) | 29–18 (62%) | — | +2.00 | 2017 | 1810 | 134.4 | -0.07 | +0.58 | 1.038 | 50.9% | -21 | — | -60 | 55.2% | +0.15 | 6–4 (60%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | +0.94 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2043 | 164.3 | +4.61 | +2.86 | 1.228 | 52.9% | +52 | +81 | -56 | 67.0% | +0.88 | 10–11 (48%) | 26–16 (62%) | — | -0.71 | 2018 | 1800 | 151.9 | -0.36 | -0.06 | 0.961 | 49.3% | -3 | -173 | — | 46.4% | -0.20 | 11–3 (79%) | 8–12 (40%) | — | -0.51 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2125 | 163.6 | +6.54 | +2.29 | 1.293 | 53.2% | -28 | +80 | -35 | 71.6% | +1.29 | 11–6 (65%) | 25–12 (68%) | — | -1.29 | 2019 | 1672 | 144.1 | -3.39 | -1.36 | 0.820 | 46.7% | +60 | -106 | +26 | 36.7% | -0.85 | 5–7 (42%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | -1.60 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1623 | 120.0 | -1.23 | -1.08 | 0.921 | 48.9% | +60 | — | — | 30.8% | -0.46 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.24 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1758 | 125.5 | -0.63 | -0.49 | 0.973 | 49.7% | +19 | — | -47 | 54.1% | +0.10 | 7–2 (78%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +0.90 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1575 | 116.4 | -5.50 | -2.19 | 0.723 | 44.1% | +37 | — | +117 | 16.7% | -2.36 | — | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1567 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2260 | 170.2 | +4.00 | +3.03 | 1.196 | 52.7% | +3 | +40 | -120 | 66.0% | +0.90 | 145–95 (60%) | 220–142 (61%) | 106.9 | -0.22 | — | 1885 | 137.5 | -1.36 | -0.43 | 0.916 | 48.6% | +20 | -162 | -24 | 43.5% | -0.44 | 32–21 (60%) | 29–37 (44%) | 103.1 | -0.66 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | 8 | 13 | 21 | Nov 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Jannik Sinner | 4 | 11 | 15 | Jul 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 5 | 9 | 14 | Nov 2, 2024 | H2H |
| Carlos Alcaraz | 6 | 7 | 13 | Jan 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 5 | 8 | 13 | Jun 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 27, 2021 | H2H |
| Andreas Seppi | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Guido Pella | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Benoit Paire | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 3, 2022 | H2H |
| Cameron Norrie | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 25, 2022 | H2H |