H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Alexander Zverev holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexander Zverev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Zverev won the 2023 Swedish Open second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | 6-1 6-0 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data | Jul 21, 2023* | R16 | Swedish Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,260 | 541 | 218 | 71.3% | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #280 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 121 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,011 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,055 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,130 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 58–13 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 0 | 19 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,183 | 0 | 19 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,096 | 0 | 21 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,132 | 0 | 23 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #89 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 54–23 | 70.1% | #3 | 2,042 | 0 | 24 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 46–12 | 79.3% | #2 | 2,129 | 1 | 25 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #109 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 29 | 14 | 43 | 67.4% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 33 | 13 | 46 | 71.7% | 20 | 3 | 23 | 87.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2021 | 40 | 7 | 47 | 85.1% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2023 | 29 | 15 | 44 | 65.9% | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 35 | 11 | 46 | 76.1% | 23 | 6 | 29 | 79.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2021 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2025 | 30 | 13 | 43 | 69.8% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2022 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | 2026 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 2023 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 301 | 128 | 429 | 70.2% | 186 | 65 | 251 | 74.1% | 54 | 25 | 79 | 68.4% | — | 20 | 42 | 62 | 32.3% | 59 | 72 | 131 | 45.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 742/761 of Alexander Zverev's and 200/202 of Thiago Monteiro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 35.9% | 50.0% | 24.0% | 25.0% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 10/10 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 53.6% | 58.1% | 49.6% | 50.1% | 32.4% | 54.3% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 31/31 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 60.6% | 71.8% | 48.2% | 59.3% | 47.3% | 62.4% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 66/66 | 6.3 | 4.5 | 61.4% | 72.5% | 51.2% | 63.7% | 45.9% | 64.3% | 38.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 75/75 | 8.1 | 3.5 | 64.4% | 75.3% | 54.1% | 62.6% | 50.9% | 67.9% | 37.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 73/73 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 64.3% | 75.7% | 54.2% | 54.8% | 47.0% | 67.8% | 40.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 65/65 | 10.7 | 5.9 | 66.8% | 75.6% | 45.7% | 58.9% | 42.5% | 65.5% | 39.0% | 2016 | 12/12 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 67.1% | 68.7% | 53.9% | 51.1% | 35.9% | 63.6% | 32.0% |
| 23 | 2020 | 36/36 | 11.3 | 5.3 | 68.6% | 78.3% | 47.9% | 61.1% | 45.3% | 68.8% | 40.5% | 2017 | 33/33 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 65.3% | 69.2% | 48.7% | 53.7% | 44.5% | 62.1% | 33.5% |
| 24 | 2021 | 64/71 | 10.4 | 3.8 | 68.0% | 77.8% | 52.9% | 56.1% | 43.9% | 69.8% | 40.6% | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 60.3% | 73.4% | 54.4% | 63.7% | 41.9% | 66.1% | 33.1% |
| 25 | 2022 | 34/35 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 71.6% | 73.7% | 48.5% | 56.4% | 51.2% | 66.5% | 39.7% | 2019 | 13/13 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 64.6% | 69.2% | 47.9% | 46.3% | 35.3% | 61.2% | 35.9% |
| 26 | 2023 | 78/78 | 8.1 | 2.8 | 70.8% | 74.5% | 50.6% | 62.7% | 37.4% | 67.3% | 37.9% | 2020 | 16/16 | 6.5 | 1.9 | 68.1% | 72.8% | 53.1% | 66.9% | 39.2% | 66.7% | 36.5% |
| 27 | 2024 | 79/83 | 9.6 | 2.3 | 70.8% | 78.3% | 57.0% | 68.1% | 43.1% | 71.9% | 38.5% | 2021 | 28/29 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 67.3% | 72.3% | 51.9% | 67.3% | 41.8% | 65.5% | 36.2% |
| 28 | 2025 | 73/77 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 71.8% | 74.3% | 53.2% | 52.9% | 41.9% | 68.7% | 38.5% | 2022 | 32/32 | 6.5 | 1.4 | 66.1% | 73.0% | 54.9% | 62.9% | 44.0% | 66.8% | 32.5% |
| 29 | 2026 | 57/60 | 9.6 | 2.3 | 72.0% | 76.6% | 57.2% | 50.8% | 40.0% | 71.2% | 37.1% | 2023 | 22/22 | 7.2 | 2.5 | 60.7% | 71.7% | 51.6% | 56.8% | 35.0% | 64.1% | 31.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 20/21 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 64.9% | 73.3% | 54.1% | 61.4% | 45.9% | 66.7% | 36.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7/7 | 7.6 | 4.3 | 61.6% | 72.7% | 48.0% | 54.3% | 27.9% | 63.1% | 32.1% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1/1 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 69.0% | 74.0% | 26.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 59.0% | 24.0% |
| Career | — | 742/761 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 67.5% | 75.2% | 52.2% | 59.1% | 44.1% | 67.7% | 38.6% | — | 200/202 | 5.6 | 2.3 | 64.9% | 71.7% | 51.9% | 59.4% | 40.6% | 64.7% | 33.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 2011 | 1486 | 92.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 1497 | 101.5 | +0.17 | -1.12 | 0.589 | 36.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 1574 | 121.3 | -3.93 | -0.69 | 0.816 | 45.7% | — | +27 | — | 40.9% | -1.05 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.23 | 2011 | 1484 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 1768 | 138.7 | -1.35 | -1.51 | 0.885 | 48.3% | -73 | -98 | -78 | 44.7% | -0.32 | 10–7 (59%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | -0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 2011 | 165.0 | +0.87 | +2.35 | 1.080 | 51.5% | -35 | -158 | -148 | 59.6% | +0.51 | 17–10 (63%) | 19–12 (61%) | — | -1.23 | 2013 | 1470 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2055 | 170.5 | +4.24 | +3.03 | 1.173 | 52.7% | -35 | -1 | -103 | 66.0% | +0.83 | 18–10 (64%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | -0.40 | 2014 | 1473 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 2126 | 170.2 | +3.79 | +4.87 | 1.253 | 53.4% | -14 | +77 | -205 | 70.0% | +1.05 | 12–10 (55%) | 15–6 (71%) | — | +2.37 | 2015 | 1510 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 2031 | 164.5 | +1.72 | +3.34 | 1.133 | 51.9% | +27 | +88 | -162 | 59.0% | +0.50 | 12–10 (55%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | +2.74 | 2016 | 1594 | 131.6 | -0.11 | -1.68 | 0.878 | 48.6% | — | +103 | — | 50.0% | +0.04 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.13 |
| 23 | 2020 | 2130 | 170.0 | +5.36 | +3.59 | 1.298 | 53.8% | +21 | -50 | — | 69.7% | +1.16 | 7–3 (70%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | -0.61 | 2017 | 1624 | 133.1 | -1.63 | -2.98 | 0.884 | 48.3% | -101 | +60 | — | 39.6% | -0.76 | 5–11 (31%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | +0.52 |
| 24 | 2021 | 2255 | 175.2 | +6.59 | +4.64 | 1.343 | 54.3% | +32 | -37 | -344 | 75.8% | +1.53 | 11–8 (58%) | 20–10 (67%) | — | -1.85 | 2018 | 1645 | 127.0 | +1.64 | -2.08 | 0.975 | 50.2% | — | +83 | — | 52.5% | +0.13 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | +0.01 |
| 25 | 2022 | 2184 | 161.5 | +2.95 | +3.25 | 1.185 | 52.8% | +15 | +81 | — | 70.2% | +1.06 | 6–3 (67%) | 11–2 (85%) | — | +0.04 | 2019 | 1643 | 121.8 | -1.82 | -0.72 | 0.925 | 48.1% | -93 | +69 | — | 21.9% | -1.25 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.13 |
| 26 | 2023 | 2096 | 163.2 | +3.63 | +2.62 | 1.161 | 52.2% | +12 | +96 | -130 | 61.7% | +0.76 | 18–5 (78%) | 18–20 (47%) | — | -1.77 | 2020 | 1687 | 134.0 | +1.32 | -1.36 | 1.096 | 51.2% | -94 | +48 | — | 51.2% | +0.21 | 2–2 (50%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | -0.23 |
| 27 | 2024 | 2132 | 169.5 | +7.35 | +3.38 | 1.373 | 54.4% | +6 | +88 | -104 | 71.6% | +1.32 | 12–11 (52%) | 29–18 (62%) | — | +2.00 | 2021 | 1614 | 130.7 | +1.64 | -1.28 | 1.048 | 50.9% | +12 | +37 | — | 47.9% | -0.03 | 2–5 (29%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +1.35 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2043 | 164.3 | +4.61 | +2.86 | 1.228 | 52.9% | +52 | +81 | -56 | 67.0% | +0.88 | 10–11 (48%) | 26–16 (62%) | — | -0.71 | 2022 | 1680 | 129.8 | +2.13 | -3.39 | 0.978 | 49.8% | -31 | -6 | -48 | 43.8% | -0.19 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | -0.40 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2129 | 163.5 | +6.53 | +2.26 | 1.290 | 53.2% | -25 | +78 | -38 | 71.3% | +1.26 | 12–6 (67%) | 25–13 (66%) | — | -1.28 | 2023 | 1604 | 127.0 | +0.05 | -3.69 | 0.877 | 48.0% | +4 | +31 | — | 38.7% | -0.68 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.59 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1657 | 132.8 | +2.23 | -0.04 | 1.083 | 51.4% | -110 | +149 | — | 47.1% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.52 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1562 | 114.0 | -0.35 | -4.19 | 0.872 | 48.0% | — | +103 | — | 44.0% | -0.72 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +0.78 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1560 | 105.2 | +0.21 | +0.07 | 0.585 | 42.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.05 |
| Career | — | 2260 | 170.2 | +4.00 | +3.03 | 1.196 | 52.7% | +3 | +40 | -120 | 66.0% | +0.90 | 146–95 (61%) | 220–143 (61%) | 106.8 | -0.22 | — | 1780 | 133.3 | +0.63 | -2.19 | 0.962 | 49.5% | -42 | +66 | -48 | 43.5% | -0.34 | 30–51 (37%) | 49–52 (49%) | 96.4 | +0.43 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | 8 | 13 | 21 | Nov 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Jannik Sinner | 4 | 11 | 15 | Jul 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 5 | 9 | 14 | Nov 2, 2024 | H2H |
| Carlos Alcaraz | 6 | 7 | 13 | Jan 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 5 | 8 | 13 | Jun 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Sebastian Baez | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Gael Monfils | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 10, 2024 | H2H |
| Dusan Lajovic | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Karen Khachanov | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 29, 2023 | H2H |