H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 0-2
Tommy Robredo holds a 2–0 lead over Alexander Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2015 Hamburg third round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2015* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2015* | Bastad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 6-3 6-4 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Tommy Robredo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 |