H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Alexei Popyrin vs Daniel Evans H2H: 0-3
Daniel Evans holds a 3–0 lead over Alexei Popyrin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Evans leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2023 Marrakech fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 26
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2023* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Daniel Evans | 6-1 6-3 | Alexei Popyrin | Match data |
| Sep 5, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 4-6 3-6 6-3 6-4 7-6(1) | Alexei Popyrin | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2021* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Daniel Evans | 6-4 6-4 | Alexei Popyrin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexei Popyrin | #103 | #19 | 2,250 | 1,936 | 113 | 148 | 43.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexei Popyrin | Daniel Evans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #147 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #113 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #61 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #120 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #24 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,787 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #103 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |