Aljaz Bedene
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | 1 | 9 | 10 | Jul 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Benoit Paire | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 13, 2020 | H2H |
| Marco Cecchinato | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 22, 2021 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 20, 2021 | H2H |
| Milos Raonic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 4, 2020 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Aljaz Bedene vs Federico Gaio
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Aljaz Bedene vs Federico Gaio.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aljaz Bedene | 6-4 6-2 | Federico Gaio | Match data | Apr 24, 2017 | Q1 | Budapest | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Aljaz Bedene | 6-4 6-3 | Federico Gaio | Match data | Mar 22, 2017* | Q1 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 131 | 160 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federico Gaio | #1,461 | #124 | 548 | 1,568 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #95 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #254 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,844 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 21 | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 57 | 74 | 131 | 43.5% | 61 | 64 | 125 | 48.8% | 13 | 22 | 35 | 37.1% | — | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 290/291 of Aljaz Bedene's and 18/18 of Federico Gaio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 2011 | 2/2 | 9.0 | 2.5 | 60.2% | 81.9% | 49.2% | 42.9% | 33.3% | 69.0% | 28.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 7/7 | 5.6 | 3.6 | 56.4% | 71.7% | 41.5% | 62.9% | 49.7% | 57.7% | 34.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 29/29 | 7.9 | 3.7 | 57.4% | 72.6% | 50.5% | 49.4% | 43.5% | 62.9% | 36.7% | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 64.0% | 71.9% | 38.9% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 60.0% | 25.5% |
| 24 | 2014 | 14/14 | 8.8 | 3.1 | 53.1% | 71.5% | 45.5% | 45.9% | 48.1% | 59.5% | 33.9% | 2016 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 62.5% | 60.0% | 25.0% | 58.3% | 42.9% | 46.9% | 39.1% |
| 25 | 2015 | 34/34 | 8.1 | 2.9 | 54.0% | 76.1% | 48.8% | 58.9% | 43.1% | 63.5% | 35.6% | 2017 | 4/4 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 52.9% | 75.3% | 53.0% | 73.1% | 32.1% | 64.8% | 31.7% |
| 26 | 2016 | 31/31 | 9.1 | 2.9 | 57.4% | 73.7% | 49.6% | 55.2% | 42.1% | 63.3% | 35.5% | 2018 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 7.5 | 54.6% | 67.8% | 48.1% | 71.7% | 36.7% | 58.9% | 32.6% |
| 27 | 2017 | 37/37 | 7.9 | 2.0 | 59.3% | 73.4% | 52.1% | 55.4% | 40.6% | 64.8% | 36.3% | 2019 | 1/1 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 55.1% | 69.4% | 47.5% | 44.4% | 42.9% | 59.6% | 34.7% |
| 28 | 2018 | 36/36 | 8.1 | 2.2 | 57.6% | 72.3% | 49.3% | 59.6% | 32.0% | 62.3% | 37.5% | 2020 | 3/3 | 9.0 | 3.7 | 56.7% | 73.1% | 47.7% | 40.0% | 45.7% | 62.1% | 37.2% |
| 29 | 2019 | 35/36 | 9.4 | 3.2 | 57.1% | 74.2% | 49.1% | 59.0% | 45.0% | 63.9% | 35.1% | 2021 | 5/5 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 58.7% | 64.4% | 47.9% | 31.5% | 37.6% | 57.6% | 34.7% |
| 30 | 2020 | 22/22 | 9.4 | 3.7 | 56.7% | 77.7% | 45.9% | 56.2% | 31.1% | 64.3% | 30.5% | 2022 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 45.8% | 78.8% | 38.5% | 70.0% | 25.0% | 56.9% | 34.7% |
| 31 | 2021 | 30/30 | 8.2 | 3.6 | 54.2% | 75.6% | 50.8% | 54.9% | 41.8% | 64.1% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 13/13 | 8.7 | 4.8 | 54.8% | 72.7% | 45.1% | 58.4% | 39.4% | 60.0% | 32.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 290/291 | 8.4 | 3.0 | 56.5% | 74.1% | 49.1% | 55.9% | 40.7% | 63.2% | 35.4% | — | 18/18 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 56.2% | 69.9% | 46.7% | 49.2% | 37.3% | 59.7% | 33.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1495 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1510 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1482 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 1598 | 111.4 | -3.13 | +1.53 | 0.912 | 49.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 1628 | 112.4 | -0.63 | -2.09 | 0.811 | 46.5% | +15 | -14 | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 1631 | 135.7 | -0.57 | -0.46 | 0.989 | 49.7% | -24 | +25 | -80 | 43.4% | -0.46 | 3–9 (25%) | 5–4 (56%) | 98.7 | -0.37 | 2015 | 1505 | 112.7 | -0.95 | +1.71 | 0.637 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1671 | 125.5 | -2.62 | -1.76 | 0.838 | 46.8% | +7 | +10 | — | 29.4% | -1.21 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.9 | -0.18 | 2016 | 1472 | 100.3 | -0.98 | -2.76 | 0.735 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1777 | 143.0 | -0.50 | -0.29 | 0.974 | 49.4% | +5 | -47 | -158 | 45.2% | -0.30 | 7–2 (78%) | 9–5 (64%) | 110.1 | -0.03 | 2017 | 1478 | 103.6 | -1.30 | -0.39 | 0.899 | 48.1% | — | +54 | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1740 | 139.8 | -0.05 | -0.03 | 0.968 | 49.2% | +1 | -8 | -110 | 41.0% | -0.41 | 6–8 (43%) | 10–7 (59%) | 99.1 | +0.06 | 2018 | 1550 | 114.7 | +0.83 | -1.03 | 0.792 | 47.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.20 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.01 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1816 | 141.4 | +0.23 | +0.59 | 1.031 | 49.9% | -96 | -15 | -84 | 50.6% | +0.28 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–9 (40%) | 103.5 | +0.31 | 2019 | 1488 | 103.6 | -1.90 | -4.23 | 0.859 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1733 | 146.7 | -0.98 | +1.27 | 0.996 | 49.7% | -89 | +112 | -31 | 46.8% | -0.17 | 9–9 (50%) | 9–9 (50%) | 98.2 | -1.19 | 2020 | 1429 | 102.4 | +0.59 | -1.53 | 0.979 | 49.5% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.26 |
| 29 | 2019 | 1844 | 145.1 | +0.02 | -0.45 | 0.970 | 49.6% | -71 | -22 | -134 | 51.6% | -0.02 | 6–7 (46%) | 11–10 (52%) | 101.2 | -0.41 | 2021 | 1515 | 114.2 | -0.31 | -1.59 | 0.819 | 46.7% | — | -47 | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.31 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1799 | 141.8 | +0.66 | -2.51 | 0.855 | 47.5% | -20 | +2 | — | 46.3% | -0.15 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.8 | -0.46 | 2022 | 1478 | 99.3 | -0.15 | -1.03 | 0.806 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.03 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1774 | 129.1 | +0.73 | -0.73 | 1.019 | 50.0% | -1 | -14 | -65 | 49.4% | -0.03 | 5–4 (56%) | 9–7 (56%) | 100.8 | -0.98 | 2023 | 1475 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1661 | 118.5 | -2.51 | -2.70 | 0.811 | 46.8% | +31 | +88 | — | 36.6% | -0.76 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 93.6 | +0.07 | 2024 | 1466 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1893 | 144.0 | -0.36 | -0.42 | 0.960 | 49.1% | -29 | +18 | -94 | 45.4% | -0.25 | 53–52 (50%) | 66–68 (49%) | 101.6 | -1.13 | — | 1569 | 109.1 | -0.41 | -1.25 | 0.842 | 47.0% | — | +4 | — | 20.9% | -1.44 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–7 (13%) | 95.6 | +1.94 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Federico Gaio
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 26, 2021 | H2H |
| Radu Albot | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 3, 2022 | H2H |
| Diego Schwartzman | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 22, 2021 | H2H |
| Benoit Paire | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 21, 2021 | H2H |