H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Aljaz Bedene vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 1-0
Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2013 Buenos Aires third round 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2013* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |