H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Amer Delic vs Nathan Healey H2H: 0-1

Nathan Healey holds a 1–0 lead over Amer Delic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathan Healey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathan Healey won the 2006 Australian Open round of 64 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amer Delic
BIH Age 44 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Nathan Healey
AUS Age 46 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathan Healey #240 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 Amer Delic #173 Match data Jan 20, 2006* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amer Delic #1,041 #60 728 1,718 25 53 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathan Healey #1,134 #159 268 1,579 6 13 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amer Delic Nathan Healey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2003 1–3 25.0% #447 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 2–5 28.6% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 1–4 20.0% #164 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2006 1–3 25.0% #93 1,489 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #344 1,467 0 0
25 2007 9–24 27.3% #140 1,523 0 0 2005 2–3 40.0% #241 1,488 0 0
26 2008 8–7 53.3% #137 1,623 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #162 1,506 0 0
27 2009 3–5 37.5% #219 1,607 0 0 2007 2–4 33.3% #259 1,514 0 0
29 2011 0–1 0.0% #213 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 0–1 0.0% #407 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amer Delic Nathan Healey
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2003 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 6 17 23 26.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 41 63 34.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — 5 11 16 31.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amer Delic Nathan Healey
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 4/4 15.5 4.3 62.6% 74.6% 48.8% 40.5% 27.8% 64.9% 26.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 7/7 8.7 4.9 57.8% 67.1% 46.0% 52.5% 53.6% 58.3% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 5/5 6.8 2.6 58.4% 68.1% 54.5% 65.2% 23.7% 62.3% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 4/4 10.5 5.5 54.1% 71.0% 50.0% 52.4% 33.3% 61.2% 33.4% 2004 2/2 12.5 8.0 46.0% 79.2% 52.6% 47.2% 68.8% 64.4% 29.4%
25 2007 33/33 10.1 2.1 58.7% 72.3% 50.1% 61.7% 34.2% 63.3% 31.4% 2005 5/5 10.8 4.6 58.0% 76.2% 46.1% 60.3% 60.8% 63.9% 36.9%
26 2008 15/15 8.7 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 52.5% 77.4% 41.0% 65.5% 33.8% 2006 6/6 7.2 5.8 59.4% 70.1% 52.2% 62.5% 31.8% 62.6% 31.5%
27 2009 8/8 15.9 3.9 61.9% 73.3% 55.0% 71.6% 28.3% 66.1% 29.5% 2007 6/6 5.7 6.2 53.7% 73.7% 50.1% 61.7% 27.1% 63.0% 34.5%
29 2011 1/1 8.0 1.0 56.1% 62.5% 48.0% 50.0% 0.0% 56.1% 22.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1/1 10.0 4.0 64.5% 63.3% 27.3% 66.7% 75.0% 50.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78/78 10.3 3.1 59.4% 71.8% 50.6% 63.5% 35.7% 63.2% 31.7% — 19/19 8.2 5.8 55.8% 73.8% 50.0% 60.1% 41.8% 63.3% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amer Delic Nathan Healey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2003 1485 106.9 -0.21 -2.21 0.750 46.1% +14 — — 38.5% -0.85 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1503 109.8 -1.70 -1.38 0.758 45.6% +10 — — 36.8% -1.05 1–1 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1495 112.0 -0.01 -1.82 0.902 47.4% +16 — — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1490 105.4 -1.79 -0.86 0.861 46.6% +19 — — 35.7% -0.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.15 2004 1467 100.2 -0.87 -3.23 0.828 48.6% — — — 33.3% -0.83 0–2 0–1 — +0.44
25 2007 1523 126.6 +0.35 -3.94 0.856 47.6% -16 +13 +21 34.5% -0.75 2–7 (22%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.06 2005 1489 112.3 -0.58 -0.57 1.023 50.1% +13 — — 22.2% -0.89 — 0–2 — -0.16
26 2008 1623 120.3 +1.72 -1.98 0.980 50.2% +30 — — 51.4% -0.09 1–2 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.57 2006 1507 102.1 +1.28 -2.02 0.843 47.5% -4 — — 31.3% -1.38 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.45
27 2009 1608 123.2 +1.60 -2.31 0.868 48.2% +134 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.41 2007 1514 113.5 -0.22 -1.43 0.935 49.3% +8 — — 41.7% -0.08 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
28 2010 1588 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1513 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1555 107.2 -2.06 -1.27 0.523 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1525 108.3 -0.57 -0.92 0.750 45.2% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1719 122.8 +0.35 -2.71 0.860 47.7% +18 +13 +21 38.3% -0.73 9–18 (33%) 19–25 (43%) 95.4 -0.24 — 1579 112.0 +0.09 -1.58 0.917 48.9% +6 — — 32.6% -0.84 0–3 (0%) 0–7 (0%) 90.2 +3.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.