H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 0-1
Diego Nargiso holds a 1–0 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 1988 Wimbledon second round 6-3 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Diego Nargiso | 6-3 3-0 (ret.) | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |