H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Amos Mansdorf vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-1

Amos Mansdorf holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1993 Australian Open round of 128 4-6 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amos Mansdorf
ISR Age 60 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amos Mansdorf #21 4-6 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 6-2 Jeff Tarango #60 Match data Jan 20, 1993* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Jeff Tarango #63 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) Amos Mansdorf #25 Match data Oct 17, 1992* QF Tel Aviv ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Amos Mansdorf #42 6-3 6-0 Jeff Tarango #57 Match data Feb 22, 1992* QF Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Amos Mansdorf #32 6-1 6-2 Jeff Tarango #130 Match data Oct 13, 1990* SF Tel Aviv ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amos Mansdorf #514 #18 1,184 1,895 290 215 57.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amos Mansdorf Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 3–2 60.0% #270 1,531 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1985 15–13 53.6% #84 1,672 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,800 0 1 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1987 35–21 62.5% #27 1,805 0 2 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1988 33–17 66.0% #26 1,835 0 4 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1989 29–19 60.4% #39 1,739 0 4 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1990 39–23 62.9% #33 1,828 0 5 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1991 21–25 45.7% #62 1,740 0 5 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1992 35–27 56.5% #25 1,772 0 5 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1993 40–24 62.5% #25 1,780 0 6 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 1994 20–25 44.4% #69 1,693 0 6 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amos Mansdorf Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1986 13 8 21 61.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1989 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1990 25 14 39 64.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1991 17 13 30 56.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 6 6 0.0% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1992 24 16 40 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1993 31 13 44 70.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 122 323 62.2% 9 26 35 25.7% 35 22 57 61.4% 45 45 90 50.0% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 189/217 of Amos Mansdorf's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amos Mansdorf Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1991 39/46 3.9 2.3 59.5% 66.9% 47.8% 59.6% 48.7% 59.3% 38.7% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 1992 56/62 4.0 1.9 58.3% 70.7% 54.4% 57.3% 36.5% 64.0% 38.1% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 1993 57/64 3.9 2.2 55.5% 72.7% 55.9% 62.3% 46.1% 65.2% 40.1% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 1994 37/45 3.1 2.3 56.5% 67.7% 51.2% 57.4% 50.7% 60.6% 37.7% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
Career — 189/505 3.8 2.2 57.3% 69.9% 52.9% 59.3% 44.7% 62.7% 38.7% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amos Mansdorf Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1489 96.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1499 102.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1531 104.3 — — — — +32 — — 60.0% 0.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.76 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1985 1672 131.3 — — — — -36 -131 -32 52.9% +0.47 5–4 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.17 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1986 1800 142.4 — — — — -19 -254 -125 54.7% +0.53 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.07 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1987 1805 142.3 — — — — +11 — -124 59.9% +0.89 10–9 (53%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.76 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1988 1836 146.9 — — — — +64 — -174 63.4% +0.67 9–6 (60%) 13–5 (72%) — -0.60 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1989 1740 140.4 — — — — +39 — -19 59.0% +0.75 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.68 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1990 1829 146.5 — — — — -3 -306 +23 58.9% +0.65 9–6 (60%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.66 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1991 1740 143.1 -0.65 +0.28 0.950 49.1% +19 -227 +79 46.1% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 5–13 (28%) — -3.32 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1992 1772 149.8 +2.43 +0.52 1.057 51.0% +35 -280 +32 54.5% +0.20 10–8 (56%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.40 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 1993 1780 154.3 +3.76 +1.90 1.154 52.7% +32 — — 57.2% +0.79 11–7 (61%) 14–15 (48%) — -0.75 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 1994 1694 129.3 -0.97 -0.68 0.957 49.3% +26 -226 +133 44.0% -0.35 6–5 (55%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.54 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1895 149.2 +1.53 +0.65 1.039 50.8% +23 -232 -23 55.6% +0.46 82–65 (56%) 97–94 (51%) 101.0 +0.33 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.