H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-1
Amos Mansdorf holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1993 Australian Open first round 4-6 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1993* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 4-6 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 6-2 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1992* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1992* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Amos Mansdorf | 6-3 6-0 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1990* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 6-1 6-2 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |