H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Amos Mansdorf vs Jim Grabb H2H: 2-0

Amos Mansdorf holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1993 Osaka quarterfinal 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amos Mansdorf
ISR Age 60 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amos Mansdorf #36 3-0 (ret.) Jim Grabb #55 Match data Apr 3, 1993* QF Osaka ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Amos Mansdorf #24 6-3 7-6 Jim Grabb #87 Match data Nov 11, 1988* R32 Wembley ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amos Mansdorf #514 #18 1,184 1,895 290 215 57.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amos Mansdorf Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 3–2 60.0% #270 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1985 15–13 53.6% #84 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,800 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1987 35–21 62.5% #27 1,805 0 2 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1988 33–17 66.0% #26 1,835 0 4 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1989 29–19 60.4% #39 1,739 0 4 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1990 39–23 62.9% #33 1,828 0 5 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1991 21–25 45.7% #62 1,740 0 5 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1992 35–27 56.5% #25 1,772 0 5 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 1993 40–24 62.5% #25 1,780 0 6 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 1994 20–25 44.4% #69 1,693 0 6 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amos Mansdorf Jim Grabb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 13 8 21 61.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1989 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1990 25 14 39 64.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1991 17 13 30 56.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 6 6 0.0% 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1992 24 16 40 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1993 31 13 44 70.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 201 122 323 62.2% 9 26 35 25.7% 35 22 57 61.4% 45 45 90 50.0% — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 189/217 of Amos Mansdorf's and 169/198 of Jim Grabb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amos Mansdorf Jim Grabb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 39/46 3.9 2.3 59.5% 66.9% 47.8% 59.6% 48.7% 59.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 56/62 4.0 1.9 58.3% 70.7% 54.4% 57.3% 36.5% 64.0% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 57/64 3.9 2.2 55.5% 72.7% 55.9% 62.3% 46.1% 65.2% 40.1% 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3%
28 1994 37/45 3.1 2.3 56.5% 67.7% 51.2% 57.4% 50.7% 60.6% 37.7% 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5%
Career — 189/505 3.8 2.2 57.3% 69.9% 52.9% 59.3% 44.7% 62.7% 38.7% — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amos Mansdorf Jim Grabb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1489 96.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1499 102.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1531 104.3 — — — — +32 — — 60.0% 0.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1672 131.3 — — — — -36 -131 -32 52.9% +0.47 5–4 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1800 142.4 — — — — -19 -254 -125 54.7% +0.53 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 1805 142.3 — — — — +11 — -124 59.9% +0.89 10–9 (53%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.76 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16
22 1988 1836 146.9 — — — — +64 — -174 63.4% +0.67 9–6 (60%) 13–5 (72%) — -0.60 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05
23 1989 1740 140.4 — — — — +39 — -19 59.0% +0.75 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.68 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31
24 1990 1829 146.5 — — — — -3 -306 +23 58.9% +0.65 9–6 (60%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.66 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31
25 1991 1740 143.1 -0.65 +0.28 0.950 49.1% +19 -227 +79 46.1% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 5–13 (28%) — -3.32 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18
26 1992 1772 149.8 +2.43 +0.52 1.057 51.0% +35 -280 +32 54.5% +0.20 10–8 (56%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.40 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10
27 1993 1780 154.3 +3.76 +1.90 1.154 52.7% +32 — — 57.2% +0.79 11–7 (61%) 14–15 (48%) — -0.75 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72
28 1994 1694 129.3 -0.97 -0.68 0.957 49.3% +26 -226 +133 44.0% -0.35 6–5 (55%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.54 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
Career — 1895 149.2 +1.53 +0.65 1.039 50.8% +23 -232 -23 55.6% +0.46 82–65 (56%) 97–94 (51%) 101.0 +0.33 — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.