H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 2-1
Amos Mansdorf holds a 2–1 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1990 Toulouse fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1990* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 6-2 6-0 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1990* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 6-3 7-6 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jimmy Arias | 6-4 6-7 6-7 6-2 0-1 (ret.) | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Jimmy Arias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 |