H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 0-1
Jonathan Canter holds a 1–0 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1986 Boca West first round 4-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1986* | Boca West | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jonathan Canter | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |