H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Libor Pimek H2H: 1-1
Amos Mansdorf and Libor Pimek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Amos Mansdorf leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1988 Tel Aviv fourth round 4-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1988* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1986* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Libor Pimek | 6-3 6-3 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |