H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 3-0
Amos Mansdorf holds a 3–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1992 New Haven second round 6-1 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1992* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 6-1 1-6 6-4 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1990* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 7-6 6-3 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1987* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Amos Mansdorf | 6-3 6-4 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |