H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Michiel Schapers H2H: 1-0
Amos Mansdorf holds a 1–0 lead over Michiel Schapers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amos Mansdorf leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1985 Adelaide fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 1985* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Amos Mansdorf | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Michiel Schapers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |