H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Richard Matuszewski H2H: 1-0
Amos Mansdorf holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Matuszewski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amos Mansdorf leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1989 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 6-2 6-2 7-5 | Richard Matuszewski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Richard Matuszewski | #839 | #49 | 405 | 1,695 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Richard Matuszewski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #90 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #219 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #143 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #307 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |