H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Rolf Gehring H2H: 1-0
Amos Mansdorf holds a 1–0 lead over Rolf Gehring in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amos Mansdorf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1985 Madrid fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 70
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1985* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Amos Mansdorf | 6-1 6-3 | Rolf Gehring | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Rolf Gehring | #870 | #30 | 0 | 1,828 | 113 | 130 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Rolf Gehring | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #39 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #42 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 3–21 | 12.5% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #154 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #270 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |