H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Amos Mansdorf vs Tomas Smid H2H: 2-1

Amos Mansdorf holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Amos Mansdorf leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1987 Milan round of 32 6-3 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amos Mansdorf
ISR Age 60 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #65 6-3 1-6 6-2 Amos Mansdorf #29 Match data Apr 2, 1987* R32 Milan ATP 250 Carpet
Amos Mansdorf #77 6-4 7-6 6-3 Tomas Smid #34 Match data Aug 28, 1986* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amos Mansdorf #104 6-2 6-3 Tomas Smid #22 Match data Mar 13, 1986* R32 Milan ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amos Mansdorf #514 #18 1,184 1,895 290 215 57.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amos Mansdorf Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 3–2 60.0% #270 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1985 15–13 53.6% #84 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,800 0 1 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1987 35–21 62.5% #27 1,805 0 2 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1988 33–17 66.0% #26 1,835 0 4 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1989 29–19 60.4% #39 1,739 0 4 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1990 39–23 62.9% #33 1,828 0 5 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1991 21–25 45.7% #62 1,740 0 5 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 1992 35–27 56.5% #25 1,772 0 5 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 1993 40–24 62.5% #25 1,780 0 6 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 1994 20–25 44.4% #69 1,693 0 6 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 — — — — — — — 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amos Mansdorf Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 13 8 21 61.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1987 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1988 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1989 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1990 25 14 39 64.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1991 17 13 30 56.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 6 6 0.0% 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1992 24 16 40 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 1993 31 13 44 70.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 122 323 62.2% 9 26 35 25.7% 35 22 57 61.4% 45 45 90 50.0% — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amos Mansdorf Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1489 96.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1499 102.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1531 104.3 — — — — +32 — — 60.0% 0.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1672 131.3 — — — — -36 -131 -32 52.9% +0.47 5–4 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1800 142.4 — — — — -19 -254 -125 54.7% +0.53 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.07 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89
21 1987 1805 142.3 — — — — +11 — -124 59.9% +0.89 10–9 (53%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.76 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24
22 1988 1836 146.9 — — — — +64 — -174 63.4% +0.67 9–6 (60%) 13–5 (72%) — -0.60 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34
23 1989 1740 140.4 — — — — +39 — -19 59.0% +0.75 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.68 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69
24 1990 1829 146.5 — — — — -3 -306 +23 58.9% +0.65 9–6 (60%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.66 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22
25 1991 1740 143.1 -0.65 +0.28 0.950 49.1% +19 -227 +79 46.1% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 5–13 (28%) — -3.32 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40
26 1992 1772 149.8 +2.43 +0.52 1.057 51.0% +35 -280 +32 54.5% +0.20 10–8 (56%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.40 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62
27 1993 1780 154.3 +3.76 +1.90 1.154 52.7% +32 — — 57.2% +0.79 11–7 (61%) 14–15 (48%) — -0.75 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90
28 1994 1694 129.3 -0.97 -0.68 0.957 49.3% +26 -226 +133 44.0% -0.35 6–5 (55%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.54 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70
Career — 1895 149.2 +1.53 +0.65 1.039 50.8% +23 -232 -23 55.6% +0.46 82–65 (56%) 97–94 (51%) 101.0 +0.33 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.