H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Anders Jarryd vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-3
Andres Gomez holds a 3–1 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1984 Rome fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1984* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Andres Gomez | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1983* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andres Gomez | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1983* | Lisbon | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Anders Jarryd | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1981* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Andres Gomez | 3-6 7-6 6-1 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anders Jarryd | Andres Gomez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 |
| 32 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 |
| 33 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 |
| 34 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |