H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anders Jarryd vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 1-1
Anders Jarryd and Bill Scanlon are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anders Jarryd leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anders Jarryd won the 1986 Wimbledon first round 6-4 3-6 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anders Jarryd | 6-4 3-6 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1981* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-1 6-2 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anders Jarryd | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |