H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anders Jarryd vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 0-1
Buster C Mottram holds a 1–0 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Buster C Mottram leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Buster C Mottram won the 1982 Wimbledon first round 6-7 6-1 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Buster C Mottram | 6-7 6-1 6-3 6-2 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anders Jarryd | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |