H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Anders Jarryd vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 2-0

Anders Jarryd holds a 2–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anders Jarryd leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anders Jarryd won the 1992 Copenhagen semifinal 6-2 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anders Jarryd
SWE Age 65 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anders Jarryd #50 6-2 3-6 7-5 Diego Nargiso #116 Match data Mar 7, 1992* SF Copenhagen ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Anders Jarryd #45 6-2 7-6(5) Diego Nargiso #115 Match data Feb 27, 1992* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anders Jarryd #1,316 #5 957 2,061 373 252 59.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anders Jarryd Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1980 1–1 50.0% #182 1,515 0 0 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 1981 11–12 47.8% #100 1,652 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 1982 20–13 60.6% #58 1,751 0 2 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 1983 35–20 63.6% #19 1,876 0 2 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 1984 46–18 71.9% #6 1,985 0 4 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1985 51–20 71.8% #8 1,985 0 5 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1986 31–14 68.9% #19 1,885 0 6 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 1987 39–19 67.2% #15 1,957 0 6 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 1988 25–14 64.1% #32 1,808 0 6 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1989 22–15 59.5% #31 1,800 0 6 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1990 14–13 51.9% #73 1,821 0 7 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 1991 26–21 55.3% #47 1,765 0 7 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 1992 11–17 39.3% #150 1,594 0 7 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0
31 1993 15–18 45.5% #67 1,625 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 1994 12–12 50.0% #106 1,654 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 1995 13–17 43.3% #124 1,643 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 1996 1–8 11.1% #410 1,528 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anders Jarryd Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 14 8 22 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1984 20 5 25 80.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1987 16 8 24 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 1988 17 7 24 70.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1989 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1991 7 7 14 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 14 8 22 63.6% 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1992 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 118 89 207 57.0% 77 62 139 55.4% 33 30 63 52.4% 145 71 216 67.1% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 151/171 of Anders Jarryd's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anders Jarryd Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 1991 42/47 2.7 2.8 54.8% 70.4% 51.4% 59.7% 51.2% 61.8% 41.6% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 1992 25/28 3.2 3.0 54.4% 69.9% 50.3% 54.8% 46.0% 60.6% 39.4% 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
31 1993 29/33 4.2 4.8 54.6% 71.4% 52.6% 55.1% 44.7% 62.7% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 20/24 4.1 2.9 55.0% 73.8% 54.1% 53.2% 46.1% 64.8% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 29/30 4.2 4.8 53.5% 73.8% 51.4% 57.2% 42.1% 63.3% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1996 6/9 3.5 4.2 53.9% 69.1% 49.0% 43.3% 18.3% 59.7% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 151/625 3.6 3.7 54.4% 71.6% 51.7% 56.0% 45.4% 62.4% 39.6% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anders Jarryd Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 1980 1515 109.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–1 — -0.09 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) — +0.18
19 1981 1653 136.0 — — — — -27 -54 -91 46.9% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.11 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.78
20 1982 1751 139.6 — — — — -32 -62 — 60.0% +0.57 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.26 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 1983 1877 152.3 — — — — +8 -79 -263 59.1% +0.45 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.98 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.69
22 1984 1986 162.0 — — — — -5 -54 — 67.3% +1.28 10–8 (56%) 10–6 (63%) — -2.15 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.22
23 1985 1985 157.9 — — — — +19 -93 -250 68.0% +1.08 13–2 (87%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.49 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.26
24 1986 1885 145.4 — — — — +120 -20 -181 66.4% +1.02 5–3 (63%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.55 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.26
25 1987 1958 154.5 — — — — +45 -135 -122 63.2% +0.87 7–4 (64%) 12–8 (60%) — -1.77 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.11
26 1988 1808 142.3 — — — — +80 -39 — 60.9% +1.07 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) — +2.10 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08
27 1989 1801 148.1 — — — — +45 — — 55.4% +0.54 7–2 (78%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.19 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 1990 1822 133.4 — — — — +14 -52 — 54.4% +0.37 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.58 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 1991 1766 147.3 +0.68 +2.12 1.091 51.7% +35 -54 +7 57.0% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.34 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 1992 1595 132.0 -0.48 +1.16 1.001 49.9% +89 +37 +164 41.7% -0.26 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.76 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.50
31 1993 1625 140.3 +1.01 +2.99 1.114 51.5% +120 -63 +81 46.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 2–8 (20%) — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1654 131.8 +1.07 +2.40 1.155 52.4% +69 — — 53.6% +0.38 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 1644 128.0 +0.67 -1.30 0.943 48.9% +19 — +48 42.9% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1996 1529 102.5 -0.73 +0.22 0.927 48.3% +70 — — 19.0% -1.95 0–1 0–2 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2061 154.2 +0.55 +1.43 1.053 50.8% +44 -64 -87 58.1% +0.62 84–59 (59%) 88–83 (51%) 101.6 -0.56 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.