H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anders Jarryd vs Jim Grabb H2H: 1-2

Jim Grabb holds a 2–1 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1990 New Haven third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anders Jarryd
SWE Age 65 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 1990* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Grabb #41 6-3 6-2 Anders Jarryd #119 Match data
Apr 20, 1989* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Anders Jarryd #29 6-4 2-6 6-3 Jim Grabb #105 Match data
Jun 24, 1988* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jim Grabb #63 3-6 7-6 6-3 6-0 Anders Jarryd #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anders Jarryd #1,316 #5 957 2,059 371 251 59.6% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anders Jarryd Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1980 1–1 50.0% #182 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1981 11–12 47.8% #100 1,651 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1982 20–13 60.6% #58 1,749 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1983 35–20 63.6% #19 1,876 0 2 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1984 46–18 71.9% #6 1,989 0 4 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1985 51–20 71.8% #8 1,982 0 5 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1986 31–14 68.9% #19 1,883 0 6 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1987 39–19 67.2% #15 1,957 0 6 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1988 23–13 63.9% #32 1,820 0 6 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1
27 1989 22–15 59.5% #31 1,803 0 6 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1
28 1990 14–13 51.9% #73 1,807 0 7 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2
29 1991 26–21 55.3% #47 1,763 0 7 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 1992 11–17 39.3% #150 1,593 0 7 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2
31 1993 15–18 45.5% #67 1,624 0 8 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2
32 1994 12–12 50.0% #106 1,653 0 8 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2
33 1995 13–17 43.3% #124 1,643 0 8 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2
34 1996 1–8 11.1% #410 1,528 0 8 — — — — — — —