H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Anders Jarryd vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 0-2
Leonardo Lavalle holds a 2–0 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1989 Key Biscayne second round 2-6 6-2 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1989* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leonardo Lavalle | 2-6 6-2 6-3 6-2 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1988* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Leonardo Lavalle | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anders Jarryd | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |