H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anders Jarryd vs Paul Annacone H2H: 2-0
Anders Jarryd holds a 2–0 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anders Jarryd leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anders Jarryd won the 1989 Indian Wells second round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1989* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anders Jarryd | 6-0 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1986* | Memphis | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Anders Jarryd | 7-6 7-5 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anders Jarryd | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |