H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anders Jarryd vs Udo Riglewski H2H: 3-1
Anders Jarryd holds a 3–1 lead over Udo Riglewski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anders Jarryd leads 2–0 on carpet, while Udo Riglewski leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anders Jarryd won the 1993 Zaragoza third round 6-1 6-7(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 59
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1993* | Zaragoza | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anders Jarryd | 6-1 6-7(5) 7-5 | Udo Riglewski | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1992* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anders Jarryd | 6-4 6-1 | Udo Riglewski | Match data |
| May 3, 1991* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Udo Riglewski | 4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1991* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Anders Jarryd | 6-2 6-1 | Udo Riglewski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Udo Riglewski | #1,274 | #82 | 394 | 1,655 | 43 | 79 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anders Jarryd | Udo Riglewski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #371 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #142 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #88 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #369 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1153 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |