H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andre Agassi vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-0
Andre Agassi holds a 3–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andre Agassi leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andre Agassi won the 1999 Scottsdale quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1999* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-4 6-1 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1998* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | R16 | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-0 6-0 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-4 6-2 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | #413 | #1 | 5,652 | 2,241 | 836 | 268 | 75.7% | 8 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 59 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andre Agassi | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #25 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 60–11 | 84.5% | #3 | 2,061 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #7 | 1,954 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 1,961 | 0 | 14 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #9 | 1,972 | 1 | 17 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #24 | 1,943 | 1 | 19 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 52–14 | 78.8% | #2 | 2,145 | 2 | 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 71–9 | 88.8% | #2 | 2,183 | 3 | 31 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #8 | 2,000 | 3 | 33 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #110 | 1,833 | 3 | 33 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #6 | 1,967 | 3 | 38 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 63–13 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,118 | 5 | 43 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 36–15 | 70.6% | #6 | 1,973 | 6 | 44 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #3 | 1,956 | 7 | 48 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2002 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #2 | 2,011 | 7 | 53 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2003 | 47–10 | 82.5% | #4 | 2,042 | 8 | 57 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2004 | 37–13 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,002 | 8 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2005 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,049 | 8 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2006 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #150 | 1,912 | 8 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |