H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andre Agassi vs Tommy Haas H2H: 7-4
Andre Agassi holds a 7–4 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Andre Agassi leads 5–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2006 Indian Wells Masters third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
7
–
4
11 main draw meetings
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-2 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2004* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Andre Agassi | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2004* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andre Agassi | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2004* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Tommy Haas | 7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-3 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| May 13, 2002* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Clay | Andre Agassi | 6-3 6-3 6-0 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andre Agassi | (w/o) | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2001* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andre Agassi | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Nov 10, 2000* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Andre Agassi | 6-2 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1999* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | QF | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-0 6-7(2) 6-4 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tommy Haas | 4-6 6-1 7-6(4) 6-4 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1998* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-2 6-1 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | #413 | #1 | 5,652 | 2,241 | 836 | 268 | 75.7% | 8 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 59 |
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andre Agassi | Tommy Haas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #25 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 60–11 | 84.5% | #3 | 2,061 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #7 | 1,954 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 1,961 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #9 | 1,972 | 1 | 17 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #24 | 1,943 | 1 | 19 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1994 | 52–14 | 78.8% | #2 | 2,145 | 2 | 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1995 | 71–9 | 88.8% | #2 | 2,183 | 3 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #8 | 2,000 | 3 | 33 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #110 | 1,833 | 3 | 33 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1998 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #6 | 1,967 | 3 | 38 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1999 | 63–13 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,118 | 5 | 43 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2000 | 36–15 | 70.6% | #6 | 1,973 | 6 | 44 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2001 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #3 | 1,956 | 7 | 48 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2002 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #2 | 2,011 | 7 | 53 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2003 | 47–10 | 82.5% | #4 | 2,042 | 8 | 57 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2004 | 37–13 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,002 | 8 | 58 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | 2005 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,049 | 8 | 59 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | 2006 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #150 | 1,912 | 8 | 59 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |