H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Andre Ghem vs Juan Pablo Brzezicki

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Andre Ghem vs Juan Pablo Brzezicki.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andre Ghem
BRA Age 44 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Juan Pablo Brzezicki
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andre Ghem #303 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Juan Pablo Brzezicki #281 Match data Jan 16, 2012 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andre Ghem #1,359 #118 469 1,593 2 5 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juan Pablo Brzezicki #1,087 #94 474 1,623 6 18 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andre Ghem Juan Pablo Brzezicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 — — — — — — — 2005 0–3 0.0% #159 1,510 0 0
24 2006 1–1 50.0% #181 1,502 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #279 1,479 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2007 2–4 33.3% #107 1,565 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2008 3–7 30.0% #160 1,511 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #170 1,547 0 0
29 2011 0–1 0.0% #284 1,485 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #262 1,545 0 0
31 2013 1–1 50.0% #216 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 0–1 0.0% #149 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #218 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andre Ghem Juan Pablo Brzezicki
Yr HardClayCarpet Yr HardClayCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 15 21 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andre Ghem Juan Pablo Brzezicki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/3 1.0 5.0 60.9% 60.3% 42.6% 65.6% 49.4% 53.4% 34.8%
24 2006 2/2 5.5 3.5 54.7% 72.1% 49.7% 71.7% 47.6% 61.5% 31.5% 2006 1/1 5.0 5.0 56.4% 70.2% 45.5% 50.0% 26.3% 59.4% 44.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/6 1.2 1.0 67.1% 58.6% 51.3% 53.4% 56.1% 55.8% 41.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 10/10 2.3 2.5 63.7% 64.0% 47.8% 55.0% 55.3% 58.2% 38.9%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 1.5 1.5 64.0% 60.3% 61.3% 66.7% 0.0% 60.5% 27.7%
29 2011 1/1 3.0 1.0 55.2% 71.9% 46.2% 40.0% 0.0% 60.3% 26.0% 2011 2/2 0.0 0.5 74.9% 48.8% 49.8% 50.0% 66.7% 49.1% 48.2%
31 2013 2/2 1.5 1.5 59.2% 70.0% 41.0% 65.7% 92.9% 59.3% 49.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.4% 81.3% 38.1% 40.0% 100.0% 64.2% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 1.0 66.4% 64.6% 57.5% 66.7% 62.5% 62.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7/7 2.7 2.0 58.5% 71.7% 46.2% 60.2% 63.4% 61.2% 36.7% — 24/24 1.7 2.3 64.9% 60.9% 49.2% 56.3% 49.9% 56.5% 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andre Ghem Juan Pablo Brzezicki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1507 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 110.9 -4.17 +1.73 0.747 45.4% — — — 12.5% -2.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.04
24 2006 1503 107.0 -0.24 -2.34 0.818 48.5% — — — 50.0% -0.33 1–1 — — -0.14 2006 1479 96.6 -2.75 -3.50 1.083 50.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.14
25 2007 1453 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1566 113.6 -3.06 -0.43 0.928 48.8% — +21 — 41.2% -0.17 0–1 1–0 — +0.23
26 2008 1453 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1511 120.0 -2.09 -1.08 0.929 48.4% — +66 — 40.0% -0.32 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.42
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1547 115.7 -1.74 -1.01 0.701 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — 0–1 — +0.31
28 2010 1440 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1489 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1486 109.4 +1.73 -3.32 0.656 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20 2011 1546 117.1 -0.01 -1.25 0.946 48.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.05
30 2012 1481 96.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1541 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1535 110.4 +0.14 -0.12 1.203 54.4% — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1544 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1552 107.3 -2.66 -4.03 0.811 46.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1496 108.9 -0.57 -2.17 1.078 52.3% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–2 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1505 102.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1593 109.5 -0.24 -2.06 0.945 49.8% — — — 35.3% -0.35 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +3.29 — 1623 118.3 -2.42 -0.68 0.895 47.9% — +48 — 33.9% -0.69 0–6 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 90.6 +4.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.