H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Andre Sa vs Arvind Parmar H2H: 1-2
Arvind Parmar holds a 2–1 lead over Andre Sa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Arvind Parmar leads 2–0 on grass, while Andre Sa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arvind Parmar won the 2001 Wimbledon first round 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-4 4-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Arvind Parmar | 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-4 4-6 8-6 | Andre Sa | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2000* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Andre Sa | 6-1 6-2 | Arvind Parmar | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Arvind Parmar | 6-7(2) 6-3 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Andre Sa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Sa | #996 | #55 | 684 | 1,708 | 48 | 88 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arvind Parmar | #1,507 | #137 | 282 | 1,604 | 14 | 26 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andre Sa | Arvind Parmar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1997 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #169 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #127 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #122 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #106 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #66 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #209 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #183 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #331 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |