H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andre Sa vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 0-1
Paul Goldstein holds a 1–0 lead over Andre Sa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Goldstein leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Goldstein won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-1 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Andre Sa | 6-2 7-5 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Paul Goldstein | 6-1 6-1 7-6(7) | Andre Sa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Sa | #996 | #55 | 684 | 1,708 | 48 | 88 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andre Sa | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #169 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #127 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #122 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #106 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #66 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #209 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |