H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Albert Portas H2H: 0-3
Albert Portas holds a 3–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Portas leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2000 Palermo third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2000* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-2 6-1 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| May 26, 2000* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-2 6-0 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| May 4, 2000* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |