H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 2-1
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 2–1 lead over Carl Uwe Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–0 on clay, while Carl Uwe Steeb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1994 Moscow fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 1994* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Carl Uwe Steeb | 6-2 6-3 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1994* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-3 6-4 | Carl Uwe Steeb | Match data |
| May 19, 1994* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Carl Uwe Steeb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Carl Uwe Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |