H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs David Rikl H2H: 2-0
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 2–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1995 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1995* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-2 6-4 | David Rikl | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1993* | Athens | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-2 6-2 | David Rikl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |