H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andrea Gaudenzi vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 2-0

Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1998 Swedish Open round of 32 3-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Gaudenzi #34 3-6 6-2 6-1 Diego Nargiso #117 Match data Jul 9, 1998* R32 Swedish Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Andrea Gaudenzi #35 6-2 4-6 6-3 Diego Nargiso #119 Match data May 22, 1998* R16 St. Poelten ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8% 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9% 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3% 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4% 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1% 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3% 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0% 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
Career — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) 106.6 +0.18
19 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.5 -1.78
20 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) 95.1 -0.69
22 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 94.6 +2.22
23 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 94.7 -0.26
24 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +0.26
25 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 +0.11
26 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.08
27 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.9 +0.50
Career — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.