H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrea Gaudenzi vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 0-3

Fabrice Santoro holds a 3–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2001 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #49 6-0 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #96 Match data
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Fabrice Santoro #30 6-3 6-2 6-2 Andrea Gaudenzi #91 Match data
Aug 4, 1994* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Fabrice Santoro #115 2-6 6-4 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,865 204 220 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,773 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,680 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1996 24–26 48.0% #55 1,654 0 0 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,640 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,677 0 1 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,645 0 1 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,592 0 1 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,693 0 3 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6