H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 1-3
Fernando Meligeni holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Meligeni leads 3–0 on clay, while Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2001 Atlanta third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2001* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 6-3 6-3 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2000* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1998* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-1 6-4 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1996* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 7-6(3) 2-6 7-5 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Fernando Meligeni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |