H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Filip Dewulf H2H: 1-1
Andrea Gaudenzi and Filip Dewulf are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Filip Dewulf leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Filip Dewulf won the 1996 Zagreb fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 54
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1996* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Filip Dewulf | 6-3 6-3 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1995* | San Marino | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-4 6-0 | Filip Dewulf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Filip Dewulf | #1,378 | #39 | 975 | 1,800 | 85 | 109 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Filip Dewulf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #168 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 19–32 | 37.3% | #96 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #41 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #326 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |