H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Henri Leconte H2H: 1-1
Andrea Gaudenzi and Henri Leconte are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1995 Barcelona second round 6-2 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1995* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Henri Leconte | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1995* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-1 7-5 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |