H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Andrea Gaudenzi vs John Van Lottum H2H: 1-0

Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 1–0 lead over John Van Lottum in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 2000 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) 6-0.

ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Gaudenzi #74 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) 6-0 John Van Lottum Match data May 31, 2000* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
John Van Lottum 1,719 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
19 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0
21 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0
22 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0
23 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0
24 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1
25 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1
26 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1
27 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1991 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1% 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's and 41/41 of John Van Lottum's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi John Van Lottum
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3% —/—
19 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7% —/—
20 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8% —/—
21 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8% —/—
22 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9% —/—
23 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3% —/—
24 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5% —/—
25 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4% —/—
26 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1% —/—
27 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3% 2003 24/24 3.8 4.0 55.8% 69.8% 48.0% 59.5% 55.2% 60.3% 36.2%
28 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0% 2004 16/16 3.8 3.1 58.5% 68.9% 49.0% 60.1% 34.7% 60.5% 32.1%
29 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8% —/—
30 —/— 2006 1/1 4.0 2.0 51.3% 64.1% 54.1% 66.7% 25.0% 59.2% 30.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1489 101.6 0.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.03
17 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% +45 14.3% -2.71 0–1 +0.18
19 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33
20 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78 1996 1491 106.9 0.0% -3.75 -0.35
21 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04 1997 1631 121.6 -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03 1998 1612 120.7 -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16 1999 1662 128.3 +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21 2000 1517 104.0 +57 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 +0.38
25 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% +88 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59 2001 1584 111.2 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 -0.48
26 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05 2002 1624 118.0 -2 -68 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 +0.19
27 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
29 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 -0.55
30 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.12
Career 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.